From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F743858C66; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 08:22:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 09F743858C66 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 09F743858C66 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::629 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701332561; cv=none; b=DvtYodAMVzAMNWDkirE2ErwqBCV3tiNgvNm/1SFslyQxxEWxF9x5LAeJ/EBn3PnP8AmdWJhAMtgW9x+WJ9NnqWc+2pmmeXuMgVwgJICQD39txwIyTgWaclRNj7Q2LNB2AX/7/BcFVuFUYDBc4RV/G4jctMzVEHrc/70I6n2tLOE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701332561; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AXxHAmc5fstuBg2dSz0UW2p0/KTRFCroiotUf+L4IWw=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=Hpbc5xkAbpMZ1L68flUvVPcKmjKVFohl1Lt5rkUbqsEuMQzwJf/BVhFf3Mj6Pv9Kf4PxbRUlElhOEmMCBOBcfAMVL71FkCJPFHom1avNihGS6S+/K25d1l7sHadT9tY/SGpBRA91yfnGTAfG2e9ztYofZ/hTcolAEmlWkAgaCMc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a187cd4eb74so48426066b.2; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:22:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1701332556; x=1701937356; darn=gcc.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fPXs9Rvx7AtSwiAnLdkw510dM/dpHUVv34Zxvdh/CNM=; b=EyOCspKpPOTsq/niBKiPG2zef8OFRiD94uHMwBHqcyAsB+9oyX0P9US2vqAm70Gg7o X4E/3I0PEm09cfC0xpJ/wDMwaCA27X9CkKMBTwpvou3gYpPs/XDz0qr5E7GnGryBjiP9 6l/l2n5nI380/peGKTAVoVWp3FZEl/VV0fLODg48p5eiBRy2b6bnwlz76ADFvQJA8Sln D6JBB8xrB0926xg8yMEBZM+KmFr7ewQbqjVUNtLYLvplv9KrB9JfZ+lBubQ2jEEQ7u6P DrRxsoVR/48Vo87oiXlMAGeRCWa3+MwUtP+RGM7fttqlu6nU9+ueJkuPSqUzIsPZLQ/E pmLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701332556; x=1701937356; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=fPXs9Rvx7AtSwiAnLdkw510dM/dpHUVv34Zxvdh/CNM=; b=YX88M7oM5ZHgeazLY+K4vBsqtytY58Z4/WeOUuCktJJYK7Lt43uhYPL8eQ3qTgVrGB Fck/GRPZwXcORkkefW4st6PS1d5NezgRk43qJ43DqM0vHguIZClKw/LTa8GfLKkNXYUo U4pjYZ6iRgvcoG8WJA6KZdzq3rbatAs2rpq1RiFlcd/dOfpeSGB0b4rKI6cSjNHNVpor 2CBZcu+cYM5XV9/3sVeGgiAag/6jTdVsOP7neZRfKj4MUh4C5XzFMW6GO++Vf2FWjCwx SgfQgw9stxAVoVGc/x+dnHbqG+9FI1rvYGNmtI9g0bLEd1iXWHJE5uEBLvOuR1JL31sn JjjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwV8C9Xceyuarl1MnPyPrPPpq8wu76fqaiUVQXa48ry976fiN5c M4B86fL8XWAGL8llH0HIO2jS0oZvAFoV+1Gpunk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHafURKlWEqzgCOsqVf8u26DRK1l7UoX3wvbNA5OpyVEZLnJGU0x2jZRaaFcj6gqWCanWDBLfoD/tw/vatV57M= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:73d8:b0:a16:4929:1484 with SMTP id n24-20020a17090673d800b00a1649291484mr5225059ejl.47.1701332556394; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:22:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Paul Richard Thomas Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 08:22:23 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix TARGET attribute of associating entity in ASSOCIATE [PR112764] To: Harald Anlauf Cc: fortran , gcc-patches Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ab348b060b5a5a62" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --000000000000ab348b060b5a5a62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Harald, The original testcase is accepted by the two other brands to which I have access. OK for mainline and, I would suggest, 13-branch. Thanks Paul On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 21:16, Harald Anlauf wrote: > Dear all, > > the attached simple patch fixes the handling of the TARGET > attribute of an associate variable in an ASSOCIATE construct. > > See e.g. F2018:11.1.3.3 for a standard reference. > > (Note that the patch does not touch the pointer or allocatable > attributes, as that would lead to several testsuite regressions > and thus needs more work.) > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? > > Thanks, > Harald > > --000000000000ab348b060b5a5a62--