From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11FDB3858422; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:51:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 11FDB3858422 Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id k25so3432727qtp.4; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 09:51:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BLNBKemsokjqavnp4/mEpGz2Q8n89a8W3ELwwy3AyBw=; b=X71jsfqGDr5B3eyRAuyI45RiioIvjycQtfuWFO/WcKSYQWgP+qpGKmtRfEmKYsgnAN EC6a7DMqB/5VUS4Udnkttv7Brp7U8QY8cjdOlcJe0rDjFp4FwF1lnvZhwlzYWXuz0TpP 7sqWZj/GX008X49XvU2QtK4juBDyY5gAdYNFr2Ek9d3CswVgAG5Ru4U6/gsPtCUkFvza mR2PDSkhhYG6FhsA1Foja5AxZtg3s+cbt8GYpDHFGucOjxTgJVrmqYxk8ydhWRXjLHn1 fu6hXcIJ1ECmkJawMkIgnU/XXBucK2vYLT4BuxJoJbbGkkMCMz5ESMXqb2X6sa7mU9cF FGlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zV4bE/jgmTuwesDqferdZyZ938wfZufJA8Dp6Aj70vzT/9MvI sE9uMINi1nvSd1GHj3nbjtphyBpX+//gPtV+HcGje6Oa X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYX7nec8kzVfj3DIzIo7QxM7cwnnuPRcu2WU4uzNPGD/xh4WSE8ezFJtdQWMg3+YIa6rl4jSdqn/M2BN8lvSA= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5cc4:: with SMTP id s4mr24924530qta.405.1643910717410; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 09:51:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Paul Richard Thomas Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:51:46 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/104311 - [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory since r9-6321-g4716603bf875ce To: Harald Anlauf Cc: fortran , gcc-patches X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 17:52:01 -0000 Hi Harald, Indeed, this is obvious, as you say. OK for the affected branches. Regards Paul On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 22:38, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: > Dear Fortranners, > > a check in gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes had a bug in the logic: > it did not trigger for MOLD having a storage size zero when > arugment SIZE was present. The attached obvious patch fixes this. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline/11/10/9? > > Thanks, > Harald > > -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein