From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1186 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2018 06:54:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1079 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2018 06:53:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:704, H*r:a81 X-HELO: mail-yb1-f194.google.com Received: from mail-yb1-f194.google.com (HELO mail-yb1-f194.google.com) (209.85.219.194) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 06:53:52 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-f194.google.com with SMTP id u33-v6so7538256ybi.8; Sun, 09 Sep 2018 23:53:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NxDERCJgnynwf2pXmUtAqY6e5jd+JXrX855WLq3XuZw=; b=cVOSMZ1EGCSoX9BMlIYbYNRYktrZdbiuOZvPGFzHTIszTJWUcS8HfigRW1S9va90J0 IOtaKLZcWG0bufMnhocrQpj1D671WQAalouHx6pKsKnogM8sGtLizyI5GopTS1lghrCx XwEcFPIEVFYEEneHREqITzq+rCwfO82ZCllLtfGgMx/sQfohdS+AIEn9VjHlwtXQbssE ZrZ9d6i99I6/3f+zRXGfXBq8589EiklHLbdZowsQusUzVIsbavC+2XWI1ssonGwcOlm3 BBuojot7OSYaBPWQYSXZd4ULfe2OLrr2QO2yy3O6jU3XmuDCodxl+xZ66wuMgVswWY42 nvhQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a81:7a4b:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:53:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Paul Richard Thomas Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 06:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 86830: [8/9 Regression] Contiguous array pointer function result not recognized as contiguous To: Janus Weil Cc: gfortran , gcc-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 Hi Janus, That's fine - OK for both branches. Thanks Paul On 9 September 2018 at 21:34, Janus Weil wrote: > Hi all, > > the attached patch fixes a rejects-valid regression, where a > type-bound procedure call was not correctly detected to have a > contiguous result. The patch is functionally identical with comment #2 > in the PR, with a little bit of cleanup on top of it. It regtests > cleanly on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk and gcc-8-branch? > > Cheers, > Janus -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein