From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AF03857012;
 Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:54:05 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 79AF03857012
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id x20so32414103lfe.12;
 Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:54:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=FasZcYYHTOi8HP5Zpb0LdXnh2mh6tL/tHgbiwa9Y178=;
 b=HBniKGZRro6M2YtliBHQtZt/R1yQwaqlVNGS3WQEgUJDtgFHcTRNSf9FUginipwJ8X
 fQLLOBEWED6DB9GLU6PNdfbQB4QVE7UBGVQ10YJOwCZf5kWXGsGvcSXOjoXyEBMe/ccs
 nJNvuEwh7ACYuiK3xoRO8rL0GFqAJr4dMGoF9ZOCOFgDXf2NNME0758cc4KPZhtCOStZ
 tj92obu7Xg/bFosNb9Ge1493Rg5SZGSfd+pHTSEJTTsZh124j0O87syDdMT7XNh3oW1J
 9vkj7bT7M70LiRRxiX5Ga5wMwi687uTPxjy2Jmgog87DDIUb1LYNHuyeqUJhvFSt1z1a
 eQYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533q1+17TdRvEyTwhHPc7xP7Nab5CoZ3arUDw0sjVPtS2gxPh+dC
 TMjVRpC47gyY4doREiUOAr7J6f+ejyiDszj/k4c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyG6gF751ae9uEZCdWic23FjxrtcWOlfzA4i/5L18Z/EXU3njaX5lYSm5QtRQjyxzMPwR290zZMGvZHFsA7kIc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b6d0:: with SMTP id m16mr24078179ljo.133.1609264444108; 
 Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:54:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <bug-97612-10374@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
 <bug-97612-10374-RcFInEkIt4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
 <CAGkQGiL-E9qGWcks-z=5zGbXx1CThfqsoDOmxXQOiWX3ozHDqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGkQGi+v3KtDM4Uu6xDmOsavBQ0ZG_uyko7YzgOE46409kvy9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <0ca509a2-e976-e55b-0688-fc39d7db9ae9@netcologne.de>
In-Reply-To: <0ca509a2-e976-e55b-0688-fc39d7db9ae9@netcologne.de>
From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:53:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGkQGiJBqX07yLQWw6YjJJt2E+W+a4Hef3=wm5nkZQ+mpmunBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR97612 [F08] Structure constructor of type with
 nested allocatable array components fails to compile
To: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
 gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:54:06 -0000

Hi Thomas,

Thanks - applied to master in
r11-6365-geeb145317b42d5203056851435457d9189a7303d .

I wonder if this one deserves backporting?

Cheers

Paul




On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 09:06, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:

>
> Hi Paul,
>
> > Regtests on FC33/x86_64 - OK for master?
>
> OK. Thanks for the patch!
>
> Best regards
>
>         Thomas
>


-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" -
Albert Einstein