From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100AD3858020; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 06:24:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 100AD3858020 Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id c6so10184687lji.8; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 23:24:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3qVDCSVwklsVh+goULPfbkOqKb3v0xCCy1LPyyingcI=; b=IubCfiGCCU+bcTvFbz1nEpAFtrJ7/0uOmL4jzKr9ZcA3lKCcmj/wuhur3kw+A2mKK9 mPXWHMGw2IvGIyL9RXAn931i56hgzHAlkT1IK/jne6Wt5lRtFmaNfvkADdHcTPjX+tlw 7yDu+SllpFTGfMwLEPQ+t2KnGez8ubeBhersY5ADQTz8l6bUbzf1oy+BIvctel53zxMf BKQRd/f/rWr27jym7OB2t4/WFgg9hbn7CrJPeZ6O8TH3um66DpXClVEqrATUkzcXtElb vl781asAO8XT0StqovpW2AoDxBslksa2AqT4AJmpQzaH2WDzS4Q/V3SoVYA49N9tdWZ/ KdJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335sO/Y7GEWh3ch8X8YRjJmLjIsN9/3jLCf/r4NM0lFpMmAGlpq OdU4btm1T1EpaH4a/RdnCN0e8EngMTHKYV7F+xk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOJsQMM8DLR6fRa1dQteN+Xpn+015lg3fHynSaaOFdB74q6XOxSN4rNAN2+q+FODQChPwczYIJBiJLA3rBI5A= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:39d:: with SMTP id e29mr15504956ljp.259.1617603876770; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 23:24:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0fb52949-d275-6dd8-8dc9-84f68ea7ba3c@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <0fb52949-d275-6dd8-8dc9-84f68ea7ba3c@charter.net> From: Paul Richard Thomas Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 07:24:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR99818 - [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_tree_for_caf_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2186 To: Jerry DeLisle Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 06:24:39 -0000 Hi Jerry, A belated thanks is in order. Pushed as fc27115d6107f219e6f3dc610c99210005fe9dc5. I'll wait a little while for 10-branch since it is an ICE on wrong code. Regards Paul On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 at 04:11, Jerry DeLisle wrote: > Paul, > > This looks OK to me for Trunk. I believe 10 is in freeze so it may have > to wait or get release manager approval. > > Jerry > > On 4/1/21 6:44 AM, Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran wrote: > > This one is trivial. The wrong error message was transformed by my patch > > for PR98897 into an ICE. This patch now produces the correct error. > > > > Regtests OK on FC33/x86_64 - OK for the affected branches? > > > > Paul > > > > Fortran: Fix ICE on wrong code [PR99818]. > > > > 2021-04-01 Paul Thomas > > > > gcc/fortran/ChangeLog > > > > PR fortran/99818 > > * interface.c (compare_parameter): The codimension attribute is > > applied to the _data field of class formal arguments. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > > > PR fortran/99818 > > * gfortran.dg/coarray_48.f90: New test. > > -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein