public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFA PATCH] Bug 84094 - several correctness issues in gfortran.dg
@ 2018-02-04 13:01 Dominique d'Humières
  2018-02-04 13:14 ` Paul Richard Thomas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dominique d'Humières @ 2018-02-04 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Richard Thomas; +Cc: gfortran, gcc-patches

Is the following patch OK? For associate_23.f90 I have restricted should_work to two elements, an alternative would be to use ASSOCIATE(should_work=>char_var_dim(1:3)); any preference?

Note that none of these invalid codes are detected by gfortran, except intrinsic_actual_4.f90 which gives a confusing warning

       i = len ("123")
             1
Warning: Type specified for intrinsic function 'len' at (1) is ignored [-Wsurprising]

when compiled with -Wall.

Should I open PRs for these missing/confusing diagnostics?

TIA

Dominique

--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/matmul_3.f90	2009-11-25 18:17:41.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/matmul_3.f90	2018-02-04 13:25:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
    iX2(1:n,1) = matmul( iB(2,1:n),iC(1:n,1:n) )
 
 ! Whereas, we should have 8, 8, 99
-   if (any (iX1(1:n,1) .ne. (/8, 8, 99/))) call abort ()
+   if (any (iX1(1:n+1,1) .ne. (/8, 8, 99/))) call abort ()
    if (any (iX1 .ne. iX2)) call abort ()
 
 ! Make sure that the fix does not break transpose temporaries.
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_23.f90	2016-11-04 20:34:00.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_23.f90	2018-02-04 13:28:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ program test_this
 
 ! Found to be failing during debugging
   ASSOCIATE(should_work=>char_var_dim(1:2))
-    should_work = ["test SUCCESFUL", "test_SUCCESFUL", "test.SUCCESFUL"]
+!    should_work = ["test SUCCESFUL", "test_SUCCESFUL", "test.SUCCESFUL"]
+    should_work = ["test SUCCESFUL", "test_SUCCESFUL"]
     write (buffer, *) should_work(:)(5:14)
   END ASSOCIATE
 
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_2.f90	2009-11-25 18:17:42.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_2.f90	2018-02-04 13:40:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ contains
      ch(1:2) = transfer (y, ch, 2)
      if (any (ch(1:2) .ne. (/"ABCD","EFGH"/))) call abort ()
 
-     z = transfer (ch, y)
+     z = transfer (ch, y, 2)
      if (any (y(1:2) .ne. z)) call abort ()
 
    end subroutine test2
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90	2009-11-25 18:17:49.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90	2018-02-04 13:48:05.000000000 +0100
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 
       implicit none
       integer i
+      intrinsic len
       i = len ("123")
       call sub (len, "abcdef")
       end

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA PATCH] Bug 84094 - several correctness issues in gfortran.dg
  2018-02-04 13:01 [RFA PATCH] Bug 84094 - several correctness issues in gfortran.dg Dominique d'Humières
@ 2018-02-04 13:14 ` Paul Richard Thomas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Richard Thomas @ 2018-02-04 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dominique d'Humières; +Cc: gfortran, gcc-patches

Hi Dominique,

The patch is OK.

By all means open the PR for the missing/confusing diagnostics.

Thanks

Paul


On 4 February 2018 at 13:01, Dominique d'Humières <dominiq@lps.ens.fr> wrote:
> Is the following patch OK? For associate_23.f90 I have restricted should_work to two elements, an alternative would be to use ASSOCIATE(should_work=>char_var_dim(1:3)); any preference?
>
> Note that none of these invalid codes are detected by gfortran, except intrinsic_actual_4.f90 which gives a confusing warning
>
>        i = len ("123")
>              1
> Warning: Type specified for intrinsic function 'len' at (1) is ignored [-Wsurprising]
>
> when compiled with -Wall.
>
> Should I open PRs for these missing/confusing diagnostics?
>
> TIA
>
> Dominique
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/matmul_3.f90    2009-11-25 18:17:41.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/matmul_3.f90      2018-02-04 13:25:39.000000000 +0100
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>     iX2(1:n,1) = matmul( iB(2,1:n),iC(1:n,1:n) )
>
>  ! Whereas, we should have 8, 8, 99
> -   if (any (iX1(1:n,1) .ne. (/8, 8, 99/))) call abort ()
> +   if (any (iX1(1:n+1,1) .ne. (/8, 8, 99/))) call abort ()
>     if (any (iX1 .ne. iX2)) call abort ()
>
>  ! Make sure that the fix does not break transpose temporaries.
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_23.f90        2016-11-04 20:34:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_23.f90  2018-02-04 13:28:18.000000000 +0100
> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ program test_this
>
>  ! Found to be failing during debugging
>    ASSOCIATE(should_work=>char_var_dim(1:2))
> -    should_work = ["test SUCCESFUL", "test_SUCCESFUL", "test.SUCCESFUL"]
> +!    should_work = ["test SUCCESFUL", "test_SUCCESFUL", "test.SUCCESFUL"]
> +    should_work = ["test SUCCESFUL", "test_SUCCESFUL"]
>      write (buffer, *) should_work(:)(5:14)
>    END ASSOCIATE
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_2.f90  2009-11-25 18:17:42.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_2.f90    2018-02-04 13:40:17.000000000 +0100
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ contains
>       ch(1:2) = transfer (y, ch, 2)
>       if (any (ch(1:2) .ne. (/"ABCD","EFGH"/))) call abort ()
>
> -     z = transfer (ch, y)
> +     z = transfer (ch, y, 2)
>       if (any (y(1:2) .ne. z)) call abort ()
>
>     end subroutine test2
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90  2009-11-25 18:17:49.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90    2018-02-04 13:48:05.000000000 +0100
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>
>        implicit none
>        integer i
> +      intrinsic len
>        i = len ("123")
>        call sub (len, "abcdef")
>        end
>



-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-04 13:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-04 13:01 [RFA PATCH] Bug 84094 - several correctness issues in gfortran.dg Dominique d'Humières
2018-02-04 13:14 ` Paul Richard Thomas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).