public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
To: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 Damian Rouson <damian@sourceryinstitute.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR98897 - Erroneous procedure attribute for associate name
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:05:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGkQGiKEB+bY8QTLqLMxXc+N8DhCwTb3bJjU7nSSzXG6r95Lhw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33375e26-9020-328a-5d64-4bfeb4862369@codesourcery.com>

Hi Tobias,

ifort (IFORT) 2021.1 Beta 20201112 is happy with the testcase in the patch.

In foo.f90, if I remove
     call var(i)  ! { dg-bogus "VARIABLE attribute of 'var' conflicts with
PROCEDURE attribute" }
gfortran correctly complains
   23 |     associate (var => bar())
      |                      1
Error: Selector at (1) has no type
ifort complains:
../pr98897/foo.f90(11): error #8179: The procedure pointer and the
procedure target must both be functions or subroutines.
    res => double

The responses from both compilers to foo3.f90 are the same.

Cheers

Paul



On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 13:59, Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> On 02.02.21 13:20, Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > This is more or less 'obvious' and does not require any further
> explanation.
>
> Well, I am not sure whether calling resolve is premature or not. In any
> case, it still fails for the attached testcase. (Related but separate
> issue.)
>
> The second testcase fails with "Selector at (1) has no type" / "Symbol
> 'var' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type".
>
> Disclaimer: I am not 100% sure whether those two or your/the PR's
> testcase is valid. (It fails to compile with ifort 19.1. I have not read
> the spec and assume that the original testcase is valid.)
>
> Thus, please confirm that all three are valid. If so, do you see a way
> to make the two new ones pass as well? If we are sure that the current
> patch is still the right approach, I am also fine to do it stepwise.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tobias
>
> > Regtests with FC33/x86_64 - OK for master (and ....)?
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > Fortran: Fix calls to associate name typebound subroutines [PR98897].
> >
> > 2021-02-02  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
> >
> > gcc/fortran
> > PR fortran/98897
> > * match.c (gfc_match_call): Include associate names as possible
> > entities with typebound subroutines. The target needs to be
> > resolved for the type.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> > PR fortran/98897
> > * gfortran.dg/typebound_call_32.f90: New test.
> -----------------
> Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstrasse 201, 80634 München
> Registergericht München HRB 106955, Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank
> Thürauf
>


-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" -
Albert Einstein

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02 12:20 Paul Richard Thomas
2021-02-02 13:59 ` Tobias Burnus
2021-02-02 15:05   ` Paul Richard Thomas [this message]
2021-02-02 15:56     ` Tobias Burnus
2021-02-12 13:36       ` Paul Richard Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGkQGiKEB+bY8QTLqLMxXc+N8DhCwTb3bJjU7nSSzXG6r95Lhw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com \
    --cc=damian@sourceryinstitute.org \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).