From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62026 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2018 13:44:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 61975 invoked by uid 89); 22 Aug 2018 13:44:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:618 X-HELO: mail-yb0-f169.google.com Received: from mail-yb0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-yb0-f169.google.com) (209.85.213.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:44:19 +0000 Received: by mail-yb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id z12-v6so666205ybg.9; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 06:44:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ws0o7iKwv4MNCrZeKMwc0WVCYVoWor9udJCvE2S4+Tc=; b=AfnQS79/0JABNabR/0W28WkOQvt1Ka0nrW+/Z6Ifxxs4LyK0p0c9agFUXHmp8nJZJa KYC5qnHisSxVmrBUz33NoQKf6Nkl4qOlnBy8H5ILgsMr5uu2pN+0upcTP5KbXR4q4V2F EgwOjSrEy2+iAHRddydGw9mh33LrSYw1CJ7Kg+ViEPqa+YvCpna8WqvFJXXoScmL68ru JUH247hpc4BdOPbDfuRUu3zS4+63qkAathqdmyL3kHWp3Jrp02vDdYLkCZxXHMwZ6B9G 0KBpaqmJoRxwbCm0yYFj+qEGFpC425i6i8uDmDap5/ucYaLjsjV5HNjB+XshCNU1rh+P 8+Ag== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Paul Richard Thomas Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, F08] PR 86888: allocatable components of indirectly recursive type To: Janus Weil Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 Hi Janus, > the attached patch fixes the PR in the subject line in a rather > straightforward fashion. Pointer components of indirectly recursive > type are working already, as well as allocatable components of > directly recursive type. It seems this case was simply forgotten. That is correct. I was aware that it had been forgotten and is somewhere far, far down on my TODO list. Thank you for dealing with it. OK for trunk. Paul -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein