From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129915 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2017 08:12:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129874 invoked by uid 89); 22 Sep 2017 08:12:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com, paulrichardthomasgmailcom, U*paul.richard.thomas, HX-Received:Fri X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-yw0-f181.google.com Received: from mail-yw0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f181.google.com) (209.85.161.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:12:28 +0000 Received: by mail-yw0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w22so240061ywa.13; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 01:12:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mO4QbKY12sD7n2WZFiee8fSsRAXO327tBtrqqOn5WvM=; b=VBu2qxAuQ3iXQMKbbTCj205Dj5CgjLtJV3rBI8HRUPj2k4kIaS4D3vjI3wQzfAkf4x tTGmJLBNiDmiUgxK5ChSWLrGdgWtQwbqbLvj9Zi/SoxlJiAYtSAolsP6ggj5RCV1SdAB PRWS/Cx71qxZOe0vQDp2ruur22qVCaIfFGsnF1ePIs+/iBJM2MZK6I7USq9stQvD4+g/ oybmMGpGjtYya7/rF4A9vdv5FzB4nUSQx7kGzneFwLa7yv/w3Lzj2QXD/PZGII8xK/da U9qsO+ROM08U4P6ggxKjtJpGYGIKhut6XJXycMzgji5cCsu9DGNu8viELVjHZfiCdF6m KwDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgNjgJ3yUE3weyIEfX/AAUsXoYhuN2V9sb0lEpNUcmHbAVWw2p9 /snEjZGx4KsdtbdAbst/ZaNvHwX7mRUFaz8T6lw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCfzRZDlJUaV+sTMFcB3I+rQuE6B/B9iYWomuLKk7F9ZQqrjOYVhhQbNeI/flXoh36nmhoKBVaRXIPMSDI7AMs= X-Received: by 10.37.118.86 with SMTP id r83mr3271385ybc.102.1506067946770; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 01:12:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.145.147 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 01:12:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Paul Richard Thomas Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] Bug fixes, including regressions, for the associate construct To: Jerry DeLisle Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 Dear All, I seem to have messed up associate_31.f90 totally. Not only is it not doing the intended test but it is failing at all levels of optimization. I will remove it first thing tomorrow. Strangely, it did not fail when I regtested before committing. Sorry about this. Paul On 21 September 2017 at 19:41, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Dear Jerry, > > Thanks! Committed as revision 253077. > > Cheers > > Paul > > On 21 September 2017 at 01:52, Jerry DeLisle wrote: >> On 09/20/2017 09:45 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: >>> In the last update to the Parameterized Derived Types implementation, >>> I fixed PR60483 as a side effect. I then checked all the ASSOCIATE >>> bugs and noted that I was responsible for a number of regressions due >>> to a patch that I applied last year. I determined to fix them and >>> found that I couldn't stop. >>> >>> The PRs in the ChangeLogs are the low(ish) lying fruit and the changes >>> are fairly obvious or are described in the ChangeLog or the comments. >>> >>> Bootstrapped and regtested on FC23/x86_64 - OK for trunk and later on 7-branch? >> >> Yes OK and thanks for the fixes. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jerry >> > > > > -- > "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" > - Albert Einstein -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein