Thanks Mikael. Pushed as r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d

I should have credited you with the comments that you made about the half
baked patch, which pushed me to this patch.

Regards

Paul


On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 18:58, Mikael Morin <morin-mikael@orange.fr> wrote:

> Le 01/06/2023 à 17:20, Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran a écrit :
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This started out as the search for a fix to pr109948 and evolved to roll
> in
> > 5 other prs.
> >
> > Basically parse_associate was far too clunky and, in anycase, existing
> > functions in resolve.cc were well capable of doing the determination of
> the
> > target expression rank. While I was checking the comments, the lightbulb
> > flashed with respect to prs 102109/112/190 and the chunk dealing with
> > function results of unknown type was born.
> >
> > Thanks to the changes in parse.cc, the problem in pr99326 migrated
> > upstream to the resolution and the chunklet in resolve.cc was an obvious
> > fix.
> >
> > I am minded to s/{ dg-do run}/{ dg-do compile } for all six testcases.
> Makes sense, the PRs were bogus errors and ICEs, so all compile time
> issues.
>
> > At
> > the testing stage, I wanted to check that the testcases actually did what
> > they are supposed to do :-)
> >
> > Bootstraps and regtests OK - good for head?
> >
> OK.  Thanks for this.
>
> > Paul
> >
> > PS I need to do some housekeeping on pr87477 now. Some of the blockers
> have
> > "fixed themselves" and others are awaiting backporting. I think that
> there
> > are only 4 or so left, of which 89645 and 99065 are the most difficult to
> > deal with.
>
>

-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" -
Albert Einstein