From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 104686 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2015 16:19:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104667 invoked by uid 89); 17 Dec 2015 16:19:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=rememer, 06pm, sgktroutmaskaplwashingtonedu, 06PM X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-ig0-f182.google.com Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f182.google.com) (209.85.213.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:19:39 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ph11so15711058igc.1; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:19:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.112.198 with SMTP id is6mr2326152igb.50.1450369177086; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:19:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.147.6 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:19:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151217145703.GA97805@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20150429075505.GA21015@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20151126165109.GA69466@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20151202220032.GA57807@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20151217145703.GA97805@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Fortran, Patch] (RFC, Coarray) Implement TS18508's EVENTS From: Alessandro Fanfarillo To: Steve Kargl Cc: Tobias Burnus , gcc-patches , gfortran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 Great! Thanks. 2015-12-17 15:57 GMT+01:00 Steve Kargl : > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:22:06PM +0100, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote: >> >> I've noticed that this patch has been applied only on trunk and not on >> the gcc-5-branch. Is it a problem to include EVENTS in gcc-5? >> > > No problem. When I applied the EVENTS patch to trunk, > the 5.3 release was being prepared. I was going to > wait for a week or two after 5.3 came out, then apply > the patch. Now that you have commit access, feel > free to back port the patch. Rememer to post the > patch that you commit to both the fortran and gcc-patches > list. > > -- > Steve