From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67284 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2016 08:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 67262 invoked by uid 89); 17 Feb 2016 08:36:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:881, H*f:sk:56C3613, HX-Received:Wed, H*i:sk:56C3613 X-HELO: mail-qg0-f48.google.com Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-qg0-f48.google.com) (209.85.192.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:36:00 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b35so6681590qge.0 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:36:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2pPqq7a+VGZQRml1sP1C+d/+jZ+c/Qb5GTCq/ftJX1s=; b=E8D7DSMb7OeGUDufyIJDaCSiIdvWn3B9YTW5mIFTocX4qqb5qGD3F8b3vOvrtbA34K spD5QIIue06ZIyDANLmD2tIZGixHicblK0w8BL/ZVrJ5X32PXFwV6lDfD6GhLzF4mG9Y WmCXsZtBpvqoaiXe51rUdPpoUb7PMxuy/rV0Q5M0FfGVfqHbRmxnQduxROAjYQZuyDl/ ZeQhXILR1BN/E5LfzXXnddNrJR53WzrBhgcracGyg/p8wdCrL7TejVXb3K6LfZ9HjbA+ EIOo9QS96hPZh1FMpvauCTNuDqsrlT+36Xg9yDH3YZR8P+md6NRCBEtPS/YEhcVf/vah j9Eg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS+TFyX6f0W3v3K6l86eToO4UYnuIsAqyOuJoymNxT2mgAQUtGvLWT3SeQiNo/Us+aajF1kOUo68O81ok13 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.138.71 with SMTP id 68mr385960qhk.8.1455698158249; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:35:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.90.84 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:35:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56C36132.2050805@charter.net> References: <56C246EB.4050104@charter.net> <56C36132.2050805@charter.net> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [6 Regession] Usage of unitialized pointer io/list_read.c ( From: Christophe Lyon To: Jerry DeLisle Cc: Janne Blomqvist , gfortran , gcc patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 On 16 February 2016 at 18:49, Jerry DeLisle wrote: > On 02/16/2016 12:06 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> On 15 February 2016 at 23:16, Janne Blomqvist wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote: >>>> The title of the PR should be "Mishandling of namelist comments" or >>>> "Interpreting '!' as a comment in non-namelist reads". > --- snip --- >> >> Although OK in trunk, I've noticed regressions in the gcc-5 branch >> since you commtted >> r233442: >> > > There is a subsequent commit that updates those two failing cases, > namelist_38.f90 and namelist_84.f90. > > Please check that you have those updates and let me know if they still fail. > Indeed, the subsequent commit fixed them, thanks. > Regards, > > Jerry >