From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111539 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2015 09:29:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111518 invoked by uid 89); 3 Dec 2015 09:29:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-wm0-f47.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f47.google.com) (74.125.82.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 09:29:07 +0000 Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so17323586wme.0; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:29:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.195.18.6 with SMTP id gi6mr10641579wjd.83.1449134944872; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:29:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.41.39 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 01:29:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1448974501-30981-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <1448974501-30981-4-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <1448990880.8490.24.camel@surprise> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 09:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: Use Levenshtein spelling suggestions in Fortran FE From: Janne Blomqvist To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Cc: David Malcolm , gfortran , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > As said, we could as well use a list of candidates with NULL as record marker. > Implementation cosmetics. Steve seems to not be thrilled by the > overall idea in the first place, so unless there is clear support by > somebody else i won't pursue this any further, it's not that i'm bored > or ran out of stuff i should do.. ;) FWIW, I think the idea of this patch is quite nice, and I'd like to see it in the compiler. I'm personally Ok with "C++-isms", but nowadays my contributions are so minor that my opinion shouldn't carry that much weight on this matter. -- Janne Blomqvist