From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8556 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2018 11:37:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6747 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2018 11:37:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=coworkers X-HELO: nef2.ens.fr Received: from nef2.ens.fr (HELO nef2.ens.fr) (129.199.96.40) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:37:52 +0000 X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.120.1 Received: from mailhost.lps.ens.fr (tournesol.lps.ens.fr [129.199.120.1]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id w2BBbnbE092837 ; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 12:37:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.lps.ens.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B380414F; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 12:37:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailhost.lps.ens.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tournesol.lps.ens.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WK4bPvQ2UGfC; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 12:37:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (log78-1-82-242-47-10.fbx.proxad.net [82.242.47.10]) by mailhost.lps.ens.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89DC314A; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 12:37:49 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dominique_d=27Humi=C3=A8res?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Subject: Coarrays and -fdefault-integer-8 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:37:00 -0000 Cc: gfortran To: Damian Rouson X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 Hi Damian, Apparently coarrays show several problems when compiled with -fdefault-inte= ger-8 (pr32770). I have posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.c= gi?id=3D43622 a preliminary patch fixing some failures. Could you please have a look at it (and/or your coworkers)? Especially at t= he patch for gfortran.dg/coarray/atomic_2.f90: Is is expected that the arguments of atomic_* have to be INTEGER(4)/LOGICAL= (4) (atomic_int_kind)? TIA Dominique