From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fortran-return-49978-listarch-fortran=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 56094 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2018 18:20:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:fortran-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Post: <mailto:fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56085 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2018 18:20:18 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*RU:esmtpa, Hx-spam-relays-external:esmtpa
X-HELO: ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 18:20:17 +0000
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:43908)	by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25)	with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1ev5Zu-000EUQ-KB (Exim 4.89_2)	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Sun, 11 Mar 2018 18:20:14 +0000
Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk)	with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1ev5Zu-0005gP-7x (Exim 4.89)	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Sun, 11 Mar 2018 18:20:14 +0000
Received: from [51.9.71.235] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk	with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 11 Mar 2018 18:20:14 +0000
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 18:20:00 -0000
From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1@cam.ac.uk>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dominique_d'Humi=E8res?= <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>
Cc: Dan Nagle <danlnagle@me.com>,    Damian Rouson <damian@sourceryinstitute.org>,    gfortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Coarrays and -fdefault-integer-8
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.5.1803111820140.19654@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <7605E4DF-CBF5-496B-ABB8-D2B8A3C92A17@lps.ens.fr>
References: <FDC7D87A-BB9B-4AE6-8CC1-6A76183F47A6@lps.ens.fr> <389DC6F2-7CF1-4DE7-AA34-070C2C15366B@me.com> <83E21824-A3AB-4EEE-BB84-16468EE56CD0@lps.ens.fr> <D927DFDC-B48C-4691-9A5A-846266228002@me.com> <7605E4DF-CBF5-496B-ABB8-D2B8A3C92A17@lps.ens.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2

On Mar 11 2018, Dominique d'Humi=E8res wrote:
>>=20
>> A question occurring to me after I posted is, Does -fdefault-integer-8=20
>> change the values of atomic_int_kind and atomic_logical_kind ?
>
> AFAICT no, otherwise I would have to patch=20
> gfortran.dg/coarray/atomic_2.f90.
>
>> I suppose the answer may be hardware-dependent.
>
> Well, does it exist a platform for which the default integer KIND is not=
=20
> 4? or which does not support INTEGER(8)?

I assume that you mean the size in bytes; not all compilers use the size in
bytes for the KIND.

If the former doesn't exist today, it may well in the future.  Indeed, I
would expect it to.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.