From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fortran: Avoid SAVE_EXPR for deferred-len char types
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 23:24:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/MgMfULkmPlIhwX@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af158361-68fa-6628-be39-cd8a6ee2b2f8@codesourcery.com>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 07:56:14AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 17.02.23 17:27, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:13:52PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > > OK for mainline?
> > Short version: no.
>
> Would you mind to write a reasoning beyond only a single word?
>
> > > subroutine foo(n)
> > > integer :: n
> > > integer :: array(n*5)
> > > integer :: my_len
> > > ...
> > > my_len = 5
> > > block
> > > character(len=my_len, kind=4) :: str
> > >
> > > my_len = 99
> > > print *, len(str) ! still shows 5 - not 99
> > > end block
> > > end
> > Are you sure about the above comment?
>
> Yes - for three reasons:
> * On the what-feels-right side: It does not make any sense to print
> any other value than 5 given that 'str' has been declared with len = 5.
> * On the GCC side, the SAVE_EXPR ensures that the length is evaluated
> early and then "saved" to ensure its original value is available
> * The quoted text from the standard implies that this is what
> should happen.
Your comment in the above code suggest to me that you
expected 99. Of course, the print statement should
produce 5 and that is what gfortran does. If your patch
only effects deferred character types, why are you including
a useless code example.
--
steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-20 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-17 11:13 Tobias Burnus
2023-02-17 16:27 ` Steve Kargl
2023-02-20 6:56 ` Tobias Burnus
2023-02-20 7:24 ` Steve Kargl [this message]
2023-02-20 10:41 ` Richard Biener
2023-02-20 11:07 ` Tobias Burnus
2023-02-20 11:15 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-02-20 11:48 ` Tobias Burnus
2023-02-20 11:56 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-02-20 12:46 ` Richard Biener
2023-02-20 16:23 ` Tobias Burnus
2023-02-21 7:30 ` Richard Biener
2023-02-21 9:44 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/MgMfULkmPlIhwX@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
--to=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com \
--cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).