From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 516903858D37; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 22:00:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 516903858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=troutmask.apl.washington.edu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 31LM03qi092079 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:00:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 31LM02Mm092078; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:00:02 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Harald Anlauf via Fortran Cc: gcc-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: reject invalid CHARACTER length of derived type components [PR96024] Message-ID: Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:18:58PM +0100, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: > Dear all, > > the attached simple patch detects and rejects CHARACTER components > of derived types whose length specification is non-integer. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? > > This PR is also marked as a 10/11/12/13 regression, so I would > like to backport this as far as it seems reasonable. > OK. Backports are fine with me, but give others a chance to comment. Thanks for continuing to pursue the backlog of bug reports. -- Steve