From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org,
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Lulu Cheng <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: GCC 13.0.0 Status Report (2022-11-14), Stage 3 in effect now
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:07:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3Nk3K0dF4lnWodl@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef918714-da26-a45c-f050-da8e77e2b276@suse.cz>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:02:53AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Is it allowed to merge libsanitizer from LLVM in stage 3? If not I'd
> > like to cherry pick some commits from LLVM [to fix some stupid errors
> > I've made in LoongArch libasan :(].
>
> I'm sorry but I was really busy with the porting of the documentation to Sphinx.
>
> Anyway, yes, we should make one one libsanitizer merge, but RM should likely
> approve it: Richi, Jakub, do you support it?
Could you please prepare a patch, so that we can see how much actually
changed and decide based on that whether to go for a merge or cherry-picking
one or more commits?
I think last merge was done by you at the end of August, so we have
2.5 months of changes to potentially merge.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-15 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-14 13:21 Richard Biener
2022-11-14 17:21 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-11-15 10:02 ` Martin Liška
2022-11-15 10:07 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-11-15 12:49 ` Martin Liška
2022-11-15 13:02 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-15 15:47 ` libsanitizer: sync from master Martin Liška
2023-04-26 13:51 ` Martin Liška
2023-04-26 18:31 ` Florian Weimer
2023-04-26 19:50 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-04-26 20:26 ` Martin Liška
2023-04-28 9:23 ` Florian Weimer
2023-04-28 18:33 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-04-30 7:58 ` Martin Liška
2023-04-26 19:23 ` H.J. Lu
2023-04-26 20:24 ` Martin Liška
2023-04-26 23:37 ` H.J. Lu
2023-04-27 1:31 ` H.J. Lu
2023-04-30 16:01 ` Andrew Pinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3Nk3K0dF4lnWodl@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=chenglulu@loongson.cn \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).