From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F5C83894C27 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:03:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0F5C83894C27 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1668517385; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1Demln3VIiCXe4iLJjRdjM2ew99i2bc5KIlDpKiNwj4=; b=VDaLI7X57STfNTXWFUgSg96zNvNvwZWzDZ9CTliK3K2BBfjGSBpTD6eA9UP3Z7FU07RAge Qxwg+3PZfjWGZyJzn5ajkomy5JOJygU7DSrvgUZ5J5V/aRkGzCKDWTd94SRYEpps9C0svk sobFZ+ZFYpg+jStpF2eWuzzhiyInLjc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-49-tLxkN1kbPfeyx3EPd7Rieg-1; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:03:02 -0500 X-MC-Unique: tLxkN1kbPfeyx3EPd7Rieg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7F3858F13; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.38]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93642166B41; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 2AFD2uiA560659 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:02:57 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 2AFD2sIL560658; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:02:54 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:02:54 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Martin =?utf-8?B?TGnFoWth?= Cc: Xi Ruoyao , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Lulu Cheng Subject: Re: GCC 13.0.0 Status Report (2022-11-14), Stage 3 in effect now Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <6a8c0966-139a-1536-4ef3-ec99542bdf02@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6a8c0966-139a-1536-4ef3-ec99542bdf02@suse.cz> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 01:49:36PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > On 11/15/22 11:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:02:53AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > >>> Is it allowed to merge libsanitizer from LLVM in stage 3? If not I'd > >>> like to cherry pick some commits from LLVM [to fix some stupid errors > >>> I've made in LoongArch libasan :(]. > >> > >> I'm sorry but I was really busy with the porting of the documentation to Sphinx. > >> > >> Anyway, yes, we should make one one libsanitizer merge, but RM should likely > >> approve it: Richi, Jakub, do you support it? > > > > Could you please prepare a patch, so that we can see how much actually > > changed and decide based on that whether to go for a merge or cherry-picking > > one or more commits? > > Sure, there it is. There's a minor change in output format that I address in 0003 patch. > > Apart from that, I was able to run all tests on x86_64-linux-gnu. > Patch statistics: > 46 files changed, 524 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-) > > I'm running build on ppc64le and if you're fine, I'm going to finish > a proper libsanitizer testing procedure. Ok. Jakub