From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF7813860825 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:15:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EF7813860825 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-368-oyFW0TbtM1aRe5bBqrvxBw-1; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:15:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: oyFW0TbtM1aRe5bBqrvxBw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071F4954724; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.15]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA1D741136E0; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 22PCFNVp1793630 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:15:23 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 22PCFMbr1793629; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:15:22 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:15:22 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Biener Cc: Tobias Burnus , "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] fortran: Fix up initializers of param(0) PARAMETERs [PR103691] Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:15:33 -0000 On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 01:13:06PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > Also, I think typically in the Fortran FE side-effects would go into > > se.pre and se.post sequences, not into se.expr, and this routine > > doesn't emit those se.pre/se.post sequences anywhere, so presumably it > > assumes they don't exist. > > > > What is the behavior with a RANGE_EXPR when one has { [0..10] = ++i; }, > > is that applying the side-effects 11 times or once ? > > 11 times is what is documented. Then [0..-1] = ++i should be 0 times the side-effect. Jakub