From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pkubaj@anongoth.pl>
Received: from mail.anongoth.pl (mail.anongoth.pl [46.248.190.61])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F20253858D28;
 Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:28:35 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F20253858D28
Received: from anongoth.pl (unknown [192.168.1.15])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: pkubaj@anongoth.pl)
 by mail.anongoth.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B4F61A3DE9;
 Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:28:31 +0200
From: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@anongoth.pl>
To: FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Fortran List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
 segher@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fortran: use fpu-glibc on powerpc*-unknown-freebsd
Message-ID: <Ym1/zyOTIvoKH5sY@KGPE-D16>
References: <2E9BFB96-6979-4DB5-8029-1F89C30B242B@gmail.com>
 <YlbkjYW6dxpwoC1Z@KGPE-D16>
 <FC979A37-66F2-4199-9EB1-C69EEDB4AB47@gmail.com>
 <YldvrUMCG8ddv7fb@KGPE-D16>
 <DA245CDC-64F6-452F-AEE4-82F00C99783A@gmail.com>
 <YlgrHYYfM4+F5MDx@KGPE-D16> <YmrKVLzbu9QTWAJ+@KGPE-D16>
 <4E88DC70-EF18-47AC-991B-5161AE37EBE1@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GK8YGrqmPaeI8KZj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E88DC70-EF18-47AC-991B-5161AE37EBE1@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 18:28:38 -0000


--GK8YGrqmPaeI8KZj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 22-04-28 20:55:08, FX wrote:
> > Given that 12 has been branched off, is it OK now to commit this patch?
>=20
> How does the patch affect the results of =E2=80=9Cmake check-gfortran=E2=
=80=9D? How many tests that failed or were unsupported pass?

Actually, test results don't change at all. However, software that otherwis=
e fails to build with "Cannot find an intrinsic module named 'ieee_arithmet=
ic'", now builds successfully.

>=20
> FX

--=20

--GK8YGrqmPaeI8KZj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=b6vF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GK8YGrqmPaeI8KZj--