From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch, Fortran] Enable -fwrapv for -std=legacy
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 19:01:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAtweW3QXqVEBzHQ@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eef3f64d-521e-e24d-80fb-24f18ee3e4e7@netcologne.de>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 06:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hello world, here's the patch that was discussed.
>
> Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
>
> Since this appeared only in gcc13, I see no need for a backport.
> I will also document this in the changes file.
>
> Best regards
>
> Thomas
>
> Set -frapv if -std=legacy is set.
s/frapv/fwrapv/
> Fortran legacy codes sometimes contain linear congruential
> seudorandom number generators. These generators implicitly depend
> on wrapping behavior on integer overflow, which is illegal Fortran,
> but the best they could to at the time.
>
> A gcc13 change exposed this in rnflow, part of the Polyhedron
> benchmark, with -O3. Rather than "regress" on such code, this patch
> enables -fwrapv if -std=legacy is enabled. This allows the benchmark
> to run successfully, and presumably lots of other code as well.
I think it certainly shouldn't overwrite it, it can adjust the default,
but if user asks for -std=legacy -fno-wrapv or
-fno-wrapv -std=legacy, it should honor that.
> gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
>
> PR fortran/109075
> * options.cc (gfc_handle_option): If -std=legacy is set,
s/ / /
> also set -frwapv.
s/rwapv/wrapv/
> * invoke.texi: Document the change.
> --- a/gcc/fortran/options.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/options.cc
> @@ -797,6 +797,8 @@ gfc_handle_option (size_t scode, const char *arg, HOST_WIDE_INT value,
> case OPT_std_legacy:
> set_default_std_flags ();
> gfc_option.warn_std = 0;
> + /* -std=legacy implies -fwapv, but the user can override it. */
> + flag_wrapv = 1;
> break;
>
> case OPT_fshort_enums:
So, I think it should be done later, after option processing, say
in gfc_post_options if it is possible to determine if -std=legacy
has been specified (and not say -std=legacy -std=f2018 etc.),
and using SET_OPTION_IF_UNSET.
Jakub
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-10 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 17:54 Thomas Koenig
2023-03-10 18:01 ` Richard Biener
2023-03-10 19:47 ` Steve Kargl
2023-03-11 9:06 ` Thomas Koenig
2023-03-10 18:01 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZAtweW3QXqVEBzHQ@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=tkoenig@netcologne.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).