From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50DFA386FC1A; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:52:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 50DFA386FC1A Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id h11so3165028wrx.5; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FTMkD7AlQi21d/vzAGfnLiPF41w1nx+dJB5KUvKpoWI=; b=rKSu2LcU84nIM5+/MFB0ZJszY6pPfNBOrlM/illrI9ImnXRB4/ShXotsEnxVg4iSmp TkMFz7kYa7OTkahmbVqYe0qzBfhjqRjcd6AO34RJUHT81kyGnpupCQW5T6x3dS3etiNf fwl4DPKxcq0TiSMjWBPvEyy3/IJ3Qu/yPSAa8ag7ahta5hnohb0ArH0HdJyWs+p01rAi KJUo8nu7jvXGlIEsuiyVDAm4o6EfZxqXvOukeGNhxW31eibFnbwY7wIoKN8L5DRDawMS 8xK8KM1H9mNAjJznxc4XcGY40lkLIR56hBPKcfq1lcX1Zwj3c2HszaUBuRGeHiEtp9mp e4Fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ql2QZCtVnH0S+M2o2LS96x4lFhXQB1umjy9v3PrLry6fiU38Y ZflJzP+XtwYDugsZ3DnYs6aQ2mxudGY9FA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrg2NzNW399dk8NkOhmVmutHBoyJbHidQcvrNDZAjxbG95eVzmpXPH6dld3sYW6jKbV7mBRA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:564c:: with SMTP id j12mr4146879wrw.37.1624297928129; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:7d79:6000:9ef3:95cc:cfcc:7e5f? ([2001:8a0:7d79:6000:9ef3:95cc:cfcc:7e5f]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s21sm18848583wmh.9.2021.06.21.10.52.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran V2] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling To: Tobias Burnus , fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <0b4b1feb-aa45-31ab-9185-546bd0cc551a@gmail.com> <164eff68-d663-f3e3-31b0-ca0349a91dd3@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jos=c3=a9_Rui_Faustino_de_Sousa?= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:52:07 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:52:10 -0000 Hi Tobias, On 21/06/21 16:46, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Well, as said: directly into the compiler where currently the call to > libgomp is. > I don't think I understand were you mean. You don't mean the includes in "f95-lang.c" do you? Best regards, José Rui