From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <prvs=09236e4d5a=burnus@net-b.de>
Received: from mx-relay98-hz1.antispameurope.com
 (mx-relay98-hz1.antispameurope.com [94.100.133.95])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3366B3858421
 for <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:13:31 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3366B3858421
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=net-b.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=net-b.de
Received: from s041.wsp.plusnet.de ([195.90.7.81]) by
 mx-relay98-hz1.antispameurope.com; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 20:13:27 +0200
Received: from [192.168.0.34] (port-92-195-191-7.dynamic.as20676.net
 [92.195.191.7])
 by s041.wsp.plusnet.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B9352C00BB;
 Sat, 23 Oct 2021 20:13:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <a6ff03fd-f846-dedc-83f9-2d532b513fb8@net-b.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 20:13:24 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.2.1
Subject: Re: libgomp.fortran/async_io_[1,2,3,4,8,9].f90 fail on FreeBSD
Content-Language: en-US
From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
 Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
References: <20211022194330.GB27024@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <5fabbaa1-30f6-2781-446e-8816a154c5df@netcologne.de>
 <20211023163115.GA80954@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <0c54f11c-c48f-a514-e9d8-9713d4719e98@net-b.de>
In-Reply-To: <0c54f11c-c48f-a514-e9d8-9713d4719e98@net-b.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-cloud-security-sender: burnus@net-b.de
X-cloud-security-recipient: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN
X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on
 mx-relay98-hz1.antispameurope.com with F09801940249
X-cloud-security-connect: s041.wsp.plusnet.de[195.90.7.81], TLS=1,
 IP=195.90.7.81
X-cloud-security-Digest: 6a706e51a598a4ab49726ba53371deaf
X-cloud-security: scantime:1.619
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_SHORT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fortran mailing list <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fortran>,
 <mailto:fortran-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:13:35 -0000

Hi Steve, hi Gerald,

@Gerald: Do you see those issues as well? Or do you have an idea what 
could go wrong?

@Gerald (and unrelated to the topic below): Can you provide more log 
data regarding the failing gfortran.dg tests? (Esp. excess errors but 
also the ICE.)

On 23.10.21 20:00, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 23.10.21 18:31, Steve Kargl via Fortran wrote:
>> commit date of 2020-05-23 for async_io_9.f90, I know these
>> tests were passing in the past.

If I look at Gerald's results for x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.2 at 
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-October/730072.html I 
do not see those async fails.

Tobias