From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 115299 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2015 13:57:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115279 invoked by uid 89); 22 Dec 2015 13:57:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=duplication, synced, press, News X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:57:49 +0000 Received: from [10.10.10.65] (unknown [110.136.210.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9789D3F46E; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:57:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:57:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Tobias Burnus cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, David Malcolm , Mikael Morin , Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Subject: Fortran release notes (was: [PATCH] v2 ...) In-Reply-To: <20151210161504.GC6991@physik.fu-berlin.de> Message-ID: References: <20151210161504.GC6991@physik.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, Tobias Burnus wrote: > PS: Talking about the release notes, my feeling is that both the wiki and > the release notes miss some changes, but I have to admit that I am really > out of sync. It currently only lists Submodules at the Wiki, > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran/News#GCC6 > and https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html has a few other items. (Both > should be synced crosswise.) I would be really good to see all changes land in changes.html in time, since this is what the majority of users -- and press, as I have seen -- consumes. (Why do the Wiki and the formal release notes need to be synced cross-wise? Couldn't you just move things from the Wiki to the release notes to avoid duplication?) Gerald