From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de [89.1.8.211]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6A3F3858D32 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 08:24:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B6A3F3858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=netcologne.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netcologne.de Received: from cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de [89.1.8.201]) by cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8992F127E1; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 10:24:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=netcologne.de; s=nc1116a; t=1685867047; bh=OPQDije1eYnqSaQeXxwIbN1lVE5TPDtyreKKI9WulKo=; h=Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=VD3IacM6koNzWQyzEaJq/RnXi6he9vxlBl/+i63/rBbpxQ/k0uWVzGr2ofAIppnn4 QJiUzubsDj490KbtNv/qha3zH6AO44fqf+XmVgO1XAzxi9T5tRo+1HqpAnajZXQCyk 8GlirnWtj3H3hNpGT0ob27i64UTcnFG2t7sEEq5zYFPAN6rcLC+RmqH7Q+t0YMZSwY uD+PmU0vPvEx/KYQd8P9WfmW6RdQiwq78gyZ2F5ZLFULh/9kChYleGshDCxWFbJx5I TEX0y2ENSo/AoN1ZZg33A8qomVpAs7cGsPqIuUM+STV+enB3Vhk2nuZxiA85oWXKLW DrVhrCmKwXhjg== Received: from [IPV6:2001:4dd4:fddc:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d] (2001-4dd4-fddc-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de [IPv6:2001:4dd4:fddc:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B262511D87; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 10:23:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 10:23:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: Possible funding of gfortran work Content-Language: en-US To: Mikael Morin , Andre Vehreschild , Damian Rouson Cc: Benson Muite , Jerry D , Paul Richard Thomas , GCC-Fortran-ML , Lexi Pimenidis References: <4697f7be-ac3e-8c5d-f27c-3aec89b5b03f@protonmail.com> <0d923990-0b7a-a1ea-8389-bf3837e73ed0@gmail.com> <737bbf36-04a8-c1e4-b3aa-31121df66013@netcologne.de> <20230527132414.50184389@vepi2> <105c761a-5030-aee5-6587-2783a794f469@gmail.com> <20230530153242.54728d4d@vepi2> <2fa3240f-fbb8-23b6-2a10-24f9a415f729@netcologne.de> <5bde7c1f-3524-7f2e-fd48-a4b97734e2b9@emailplus.org> <2f95809c-8f0b-7d75-ca62-aeee11c6bee0@netcologne.de> <20230531142302.75ec742d@vepi2> <20230601111808.5ed7a9e3@vepi2> From: Thomas Koenig In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-NetCologne-Spam: L X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B262511D87 X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,WINNER_SUBJECT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 01.06.23 12:59, Mikael Morin wrote: >> > The latter paragraph seems more an answer to the question "why is it > critical for gfortran to get funding" than "why is it critical for a > funding body to choose gfortran"? Good point :-) > One idea about the latter question: > so that there is always a free solution: >  - for engineers to make best usage of the hardware available to them > without hassle and spend their time at what they are best: making science >  - for decades-old proven science codes to be adapted to current > parallel computing architecture So gfortran remains a viable alternative to existing commercial compilers. Best regards Thomas