From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from esa4.mentor.iphmx.com (esa4.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.137.252]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A09B23851C07; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:30:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A09B23851C07 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com IronPort-SDR: 3yo4OXoVORfw4VEKCOWFOiheImrgHBvaO4FAL8cv2O7ixEe1qIi1tbiXHi2ZU7d3YBsAefBM3C zAaLxPnbCfuPc1fYE++tg9yKnetqemIObOn+8aV99CMQqptw153Jea2gHpZyQr17dsj8q5uBlX DHrlEz3/5Psxx7Dw3+aYhcAgKTy/YsA2ap2szqqjM+rVqmWHo7fCl8WX6EKi3ZnPtf89pByRVJ xcQcjJgsxJegr19HSUxFd+VLpR9OukvSmV+7S2U1VhttfZ+0kFPINLuvCtjdXh9DxYHK6nUdWL WlE= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,289,1616486400"; d="scan'208";a="62843120" Received: from orw-gwy-02-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.167]) by esa4.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2021 12:30:01 -0800 IronPort-SDR: Vue+xgsyVn4rVmVjRd0b1AiN3CkmPC4p0y2JSW07x2/CthoTbE6uZhvc2/IZLRjXGFrK1cGjba /QViVUBgxcapbRFNNVkdFzcNeocAb7l4s4cD7EFPbJ9L5gPrWbb9zIToOLylg2kspanXjn+uY8 dpckwdDPejgn0vmgxXt3ManWROnJDLGPEXJhP3IV9DlfqAa+q80z2aPfGJsb4ZGU3fRLjoHdRz zIQCF+M+84zqBj8sb+RYcyebg/4o/DfiUJFEjPYre00ljEdvuMhHIzLclT3y2lv6k1rGw9sLUr 5Ug= Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran V2] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jos=c3=a9_Rui_Faustino_de_Sousa?= , , References: <0b4b1feb-aa45-31ab-9185-546bd0cc551a@gmail.com> <164eff68-d663-f3e3-31b0-ca0349a91dd3@gmail.com> From: Tobias Burnus Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 22:29:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-02.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.2) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:30:04 -0000 Hi Jos=C3=A9, On 21.06.21 19:52, Jos=C3=A9 Rui Faustino de Sousa wrote: > On 21/06/21 16:46, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> Well, as said: directly into the compiler where currently the call to >> libgomp is. (should be libgfortran) I meant converting the operation done by the libgfortran/runtime/ISO_Fortran_binding.c functions * cfi_desc_to_gfc_desc and *gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc into tree code, generated in place by the current callers * gfor_fndecl_gfc_to_cfi (in trans-decl.c) * gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc (in trans-expr.c) And then effectively retiring those functions (except for old code which still calls them). * * * However, that's independent from the patch you had submitted and which is fine except for the two tiny nits. Tobias ----------------- Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstrasse 201, 80634 M=C3=BCnchen R= egistergericht M=C3=BCnchen HRB 106955, Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Thomas H= eurung, Frank Th=C3=BCrauf