From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57298 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2017 00:52:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 56596 invoked by uid 89); 18 Oct 2017 00:52:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mtaout006-public.msg.strl.va.charter.net Received: from mtaout006-public.msg.strl.va.charter.net (HELO mtaout006-public.msg.strl.va.charter.net) (68.114.190.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:52:49 +0000 Received: from impout002 ([68.114.189.17]) by mtaout006.msg.strl.va.charter.net (InterMail vM.9.00.023.01 201-2473-194) with ESMTP id <20171018005229.DMUF7358.mtaout006.msg.strl.va.charter.net@impout002>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:52:29 -0500 Received: from amda8.localdomain ([96.41.213.35]) by impout002 with charter.net id NosU1w00D0mPCJg01osVnB; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:52:29 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=C6eZ8UH+ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=NNeuWy7OTYa7gJ+3pFFB5Q==:117 a=NNeuWy7OTYa7gJ+3pFFB5Q==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=sQCgTJ9KojLiwVgZF84A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Auth-id: anZkZWxpc2xlQGNoYXJ0ZXIubmV0 Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR82550 - program using submodules fails to link To: Paul Richard Thomas , "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches References: From: Jerry DeLisle Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:52:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 On 10/17/2017 11:33 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > The attached patch has a comment that explains what is going on. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on FC23/x86_64 - OK for trunk and 7-branch? > Yes, looks OK for both. Thanks. Jerry