From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de [IPv6:2001:4dd0:100:1062:25:2:0:3]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CACA43858C83; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:39:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org CACA43858C83 Received: from cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de [89.1.8.203]) by cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDD81245F; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:39:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPV6:2001:4dd4:f179:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d] (2001-4dd4-f179-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de [IPv6:2001:4dd4:f179:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cc-smtpin3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99E4211DB9; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:39:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:39:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fortran: Compare non-constant bound expressions. [PR105379] Content-Language: en-US To: Mikael Morin , gcc-patches , gfortran References: From: Thomas Koenig In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NetCologne-Spam: L X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 99E4211DB9 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:39:07 -0000 Hi Mikael, > this fixes a regression caused by my recent PR103662 patch. > > Regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for master? OK. Good to see that a bit of optimization can also sneak in with a bug fix :-) Best regards Thomas