From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-22.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.22]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF29D3858CD1; Thu, 23 May 2024 20:32:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BF29D3858CD1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=orange.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=orange.fr ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org BF29D3858CD1 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=80.12.242.22 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1716496366; cv=none; b=Y8jg7dZjwjU1ymGZyanhhy/nUz0yzj8h2qwozoAUba5zw00f1IGo97R1X+JhX6UaEvBWZ7FV2vLxkhSlid/R+biXlQggbiBeOVlwE/QBIzhLGQlcWb8WOTaQkf9mQgXqUlgGU1HEEyfopsPNV5GjcB6qO9kSYt1FRsX0qT1N+Qo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1716496366; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uGa/wrziDo3osV8vqLF0/mOCG20tNkyylMdB41K4ipc=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To; b=KWJ7OAdJqtRFoet9Tsn1+LCQrCRMUmTaq0E2KiaQ474CzZqZZbO5f/zgwnjLWClnHqrbeuR4ijQSuBvuCDWT9HIzyxUzpiz9oocx4cSF0KZ7CCawuzW1ROyqxDDpTT+CmP+dS55IceacJbYBjlfsyRP0kh5Ehbz0n7/D2zcy3z4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([86.215.161.51]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id AF75s6dygpzm3AF7BsB5TM; Thu, 23 May 2024 22:32:41 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.fr; s=t20230301; t=1716496361; bh=vA53alK4HNChO69mAvWKgwc4PfMw0RCF93tDjOcGKzQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To; b=aWRYUbBvo8Q+gPnHj1dZzGcyMmx9ydFZVtyaaxFEGi8Mk1z7WR6P/iPR3fOcQqkRp UwRnFaWxRiakX3oSIM/MKoQXpVN/eJ6PmkRojOtWla7bqYqDn8IR9VGE+/G4WKHyur iTEdtvxzVF3w5m7cTV/J3OAndBJNrTQTra0ibZ6xCTaOz5Y9yrdsYULnEzD8q22b5a 5/qsx4NzR1/MoUAbi9nd3mYny2G+ELYI9CYNfJL2Twm9e9CjHFhAuUAM6ak7BrFvC0 nj7ZieLVkO9kV+YLzT9Bmm3YReO+gmBeq+E19XI1bH5HyMyMPdLG2PNHMucmQ8hCS1 v0aCh7zb1sVOQ== X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.13] X-ME-Auth: bW9yaW4tbWlrYWVsQG9yYW5nZS5mcg== X-ME-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 22:32:41 +0200 X-ME-IP: 86.215.161.51 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 22:32:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: improve attribute conflict checking [PR93635] From: Mikael Morin To: Harald Anlauf , fortran , gcc-patches References: <3e378dec-109f-44b2-92c1-50a0f3866ab7@orange.fr> <993e753f-9562-48e7-8334-141fa97e6866@gmx.de> <59046c1b-7c57-42ae-a5a7-70406240d08a@gmx.de> <4e676dc9-c8f9-48f0-8167-039c688f53da@orange.fr> Content-Language: fr In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Le 23/05/2024 à 09:49, Mikael Morin a écrit : > Le 13/05/2024 à 09:25, Mikael Morin a écrit : >> Le 10/05/2024 à 21:56, Harald Anlauf a écrit : >>> Am 10.05.24 um 21:48 schrieb Harald Anlauf: >>>> Hi Mikael, >>>> >>>> Am 10.05.24 um 11:45 schrieb Mikael Morin: >>>>> Le 09/05/2024 à 22:30, Harald Anlauf a écrit : >>>>>> I'll stop here... >>>>>> >>>>> Thanks. Go figure, I have no problem reproducing today. >>>>> It's PR99798 (and there is even a patch for it). >>>> >>>> this patch has rotten a bit: the type of gfc_reluease_symbol >>>> has changed to bool, this can be fixed. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, applying the patch does not remove the ICEs here... >>> >>> Oops, I take that back!  There was an error on my side applying the >>> patch; and now it does fix the ICEs after correcting that hickup.... >>> >> Now the PR99798 patch is ready to be pushed, but I won't be available >> for a few days.  We can finish our discussion on this topic afterwards. >> > Hello, > > I'm coming back to this. > I think either one of Steve's patch or your variant in the PR is a > better fix for the ICE as a first step; they seem less fragile at least. > Then we can look at a possible reordering of conflict checks as with the > patch you originally submitted in this thread. > Replying to myself... It's not a great plan if we want to avoid unnecessary churn in the testsuite.