public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
To: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [patch, fortran] Remove parallell annotation from DO CONCURRENT
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e491d566-c4f6-156d-18fa-83e6304aaab4@netcologne.de> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 768 bytes --]

Hello world,

the attached patch removes the parallel annotation from DO CONCURRENT.
As discussed in the PR, the autoparallellizer currently generates
wrong code. The only feasible way is to disable the annotation for
gcc-8 and work on the wrong-code issues for gcc-9. This is an 8
regression.

Regression-tested. OK for trunk?

Regards

	Thomas

2018-04-09  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>

         PR fortran/83064
         * trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_forall_loop): Remove annotation for
         parallell processing of DO CONCURRENT.

2018-04-09  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>

         PR fortran/83064
         * gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90: New test.
         * gfortran.dg/vect/vect-do-concurrent-1.f90: Xfail. Adjust
         dg-bogus message.

[-- Attachment #2: p2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1650 bytes --]

Index: fortran/trans-stmt.c
===================================================================
--- fortran/trans-stmt.c	(Revision 259222)
+++ fortran/trans-stmt.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -3642,12 +3642,6 @@ gfc_trans_forall_loop (forall_info *forall_tmp, tr
       /* The exit condition.  */
       cond = fold_build2_loc (input_location, LE_EXPR, logical_type_node,
 			      count, build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (count), 0));
-      if (forall_tmp->do_concurrent)
-	cond = build3 (ANNOTATE_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (cond), cond,
-		       build_int_cst (integer_type_node,
-				      annot_expr_parallel_kind),
-		       integer_zero_node);
-
       tmp = build1_v (GOTO_EXPR, exit_label);
       tmp = fold_build3_loc (input_location, COND_EXPR, void_type_node,
 			     cond, tmp, build_empty_stmt (input_location));
Index: testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-do-concurrent-1.f90
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-do-concurrent-1.f90	(Revision 259222)
+++ testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-do-concurrent-1.f90	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 ! { dg-do compile }
 ! { dg-require-effective-target vect_float }
 ! { dg-additional-options "-O3 -fopt-info-vec-optimized" }
+! { xfail *-*-* }
+! PR 83064 - DO CONCURRENT is no longer vectorized for this case.
 
 subroutine test(n, a, b, c)
   integer, value :: n
@@ -12,4 +14,4 @@ subroutine test(n, a, b, c)
 end subroutine test
 
 ! { dg-message "loop vectorized" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
-! { dg-bogus " version\[^\n\r]* alias" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
+!  Restoration of the test case will need  dg-bogus " version\[^\n\r]* alias" "" { target *-*-* } 0 

[-- Attachment #3: do_concurrent_5.f90 --]
[-- Type: text/x-fortran, Size: 2099 bytes --]

! { dg-do  run }
! PR 83064 - this used to give wrong results.
! { dg-options "-O3 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2" }
! Original test case by Christian Felter

program main
    use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env
    implicit none

    integer, parameter :: nsplit = 4
    integer(int64), parameter :: ne = 20000000
    integer(int64) :: stride, low(nsplit), high(nsplit), edof(ne), i
    real(real64), dimension(nsplit) :: pi
    
    edof(1::4) = 1
    edof(2::4) = 2
    edof(3::4) = 3
    edof(4::4) = 4
    
    stride = ceiling(real(ne)/nsplit)
    do i = 1, nsplit
        high(i) = stride*i
    end do
    do i = 2, nsplit
        low(i) = high(i-1) + 1
    end do
    low(1) = 1
    high(nsplit) = ne

    pi = 0
    do concurrent (i = 1:nsplit)
        pi(i) = sum(compute( low(i), high(i) ))
    end do
    if (abs (sum(pi) - atan(1.0d0)) > 1e-5) call abort
    
contains
    
    pure function compute( low, high ) result( ttt )        
        integer(int64), intent(in) :: low, high
        real(real64), dimension(nsplit) :: ttt
        integer(int64) :: j, k
        
        ttt = 0

        ! Unrolled loop
!         do j = low, high, 4
!             k = 1
!             ttt(k) = ttt(k) + (-1)**(j+1) / real( 2*j-1 )                            
!             k = 2
!             ttt(k) = ttt(k) + (-1)**(j+2) / real( 2*j+1 )                            
!             k = 3
!             ttt(k) = ttt(k) + (-1)**(j+3) / real( 2*j+3 )                            
!             k = 4
!             ttt(k) = ttt(k) + (-1)**(j+4) / real( 2*j+5 )                            
!         end do
        
        ! Loop with modulo operation
!         do j = low, high
!             k = mod( j, nsplit ) + 1
!             ttt(k) = ttt(k) + (-1)**(j+1) / real( 2*j-1 )                                        
!         end do
        
        ! Loop with subscripting via host association
        do j = low, high
            k = edof(j)
            ttt(k) = ttt(k) + (-1.0_real64)**(j+1) / real( 2*j-1 )                                        
        end do
    end function
    
end program main

             reply	other threads:[~2018-04-09 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-09 20:10 Thomas Koenig [this message]
2018-04-09 20:28 ` Steve Kargl
2018-04-09 20:58   ` Thomas Koenig
2018-04-09 21:19     ` Steve Kargl
2018-04-10  6:44     ` Richard Biener
2018-04-10 13:36     ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-04-10 21:50       ` Thomas Koenig
2018-04-11 18:35         ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-04-11 18:18           ` Thomas Koenig
2018-04-11 18:35             ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-04-11 19:47               ` Thomas Koenig
2018-04-12  7:17                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-04-12 21:14                   ` Thomas Koenig
2018-04-12 21:35                     ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-04-09 23:35 ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e491d566-c4f6-156d-18fa-83e6304aaab4@netcologne.de \
    --to=tkoenig@netcologne.de \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).