Dear all,

the attached patch fixes two issues: first it addresses a NULL pointer
dereference on invalid input, triggered by the provided testcase.

Second, while analyzing the context of the affected code, I looked into
the testcase for PR96102, and by varying it slightly, i.e. replacing
functions by subroutines I found that we accept invalid code that is
rejected by several other brands tested.  To fix this, I removed one
line of a condition that did not seem to make sense to me.

Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?

Thanks,
Harald