From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
To: Jerry D <jvdelisle2@gmail.com>
Cc: fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR37336 (Finalization) - [F03] Finish derived-type finalization
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 09:33:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <trinity-8092b80f-57f8-4219-a446-b5d9b46e39ae-1672994038323@3c-app-gmx-bap40> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78aafe8c-dcf9-55e6-50ce-c6289ea1f3fe@gmail.com>
Hi Jerry,
> Gesendet: Freitag, 06. Januar 2023 um 04:08 Uhr
> Von: "Jerry D" <jvdelisle2@gmail.com>
> An: "Harald Anlauf" <anlauf@gmx.de>, "fortran" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
> Betreff: Re: Fw: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR37336 (Finalization) - [F03] Finish derived-type finalization
>
> On 1/5/23 1:14 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
> > Resending as plain text, as the original version did not appear on the fortran list...
> >
> >
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 05. Januar 2023 um 22:10 Uhr
> > Von: "Harald Anlauf" <anlauf@gmx.de>
> > An: "Paul Richard Thomas" <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
> > Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, "Alessandro Fanfarillo" <alessandro.fanfarillo@gmail.com>, "Andrew Benson" <abenson@carnegiescience.edu>, "Thomas Koenig" <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>, "Damian Rouson" <damian@archaeologic.codes>
> > Betreff: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR37336 (Finalization) - [F03] Finish derived-type finalization
> >
> > Dear Paul, all,
> >
> > I had a first look at the patch and the testcases, and I really look forward to getting this into gfortran.
> >
> > A few questions surfaced when playing with it, which is why am asking for others to comment.
> >
> > Testcase finalize_38.f90 exhibits a (potential) discrepancy to my expections when playing with options -std=f2018 and -std=gnu (the default).
> >
> > What is the expected behavior of -std=gnu? My expectation is that -std=gnu always corresponds to the latest implemented standard (currently F2018), except for possibly allowing for GNU-extensions. This might imply that corrigenda to a standard or a newer version may lead (over time) to an adjustment of the behavior. Any opinions on it? Do we need to always test (in the testsuite) for compliance with older standards?
> >
>
> My understanding is that -std=gnu tends to be the least restrictive and
> will allow finalize_38.f90 to compile possibly with warnings. The
> warnings are to allow the user to know thay are out of current
> compliance, but we should not fail on code that was previously compliant
> and less we specify -std=f2018 which is more restrictive.
So if e.g. finalize_38.f90 compiles without warnings with -std=f2018,
it should also compile without warnings with -std=gnu, right?
Harald
> Jerry
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 17:14 Paul Richard Thomas
2022-02-07 21:09 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-07 21:09 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-08 11:22 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2022-02-08 18:29 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-08 18:29 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-09 2:35 ` Jerry D
2022-02-10 12:25 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2022-02-10 19:49 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-10 19:49 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-11 2:15 ` Jerry D
2022-02-11 9:08 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2022-02-11 21:08 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-11 21:08 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-11 21:59 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2022-02-16 18:49 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2022-02-17 20:55 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-17 20:55 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-17 21:23 ` Thomas Koenig
2022-02-18 18:06 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-01-02 13:15 ` Paul Richard Thomas
[not found] ` <trinity-a4069639-4079-4f60-b928-1fec82384b1e-1672953005015@3c-app-gmx-bap48>
2023-01-05 21:14 ` Fw: " Harald Anlauf
2023-01-06 3:08 ` Jerry D
2023-01-06 8:33 ` Harald Anlauf [this message]
2023-01-07 10:57 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-01-07 15:28 ` Thomas Koenig
2023-01-07 18:35 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-01-08 12:03 ` Thomas Koenig
2023-01-08 13:42 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-01-09 20:42 ` Aw: " Harald Anlauf
2023-01-11 20:56 ` Harald Anlauf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=trinity-8092b80f-57f8-4219-a446-b5d9b46e39ae-1672994038323@3c-app-gmx-bap40 \
--to=anlauf@gmx.de \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jvdelisle2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).