From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
To: fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH, testsuite, fortran] fix invalid testcases (missing MOLD argument to NULL)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 22:02:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <trinity-89336fcc-9c0b-4a96-b6ed-d254a11cc5bb-1700686952233@3c-app-gmx-bs17> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 461 bytes --]
Dear all,
testcases assumed_rank_8.f90 and assumed_rank_10.f90 are invalid:
NULL() is passed without MOLD to an assumed-rank dummy argument.
This is detected by NAG, but not yet by gfortran (see pr104819).
gfortran even ignores the MOLD argument; the dump-tree is identical
if MOLD is there or not.
Now these testcases are { dg-do run }. Therefore I would like to
fix these testcases, independent of the work on fixing pr104819.
Comments?
Thanks,
Harald
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: testsuite-fortran-fix.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1859 bytes --]
From cbb0c61f9d6f06667666a33da6e6ce3213a92248 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:45:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: fortran: fix invalid testcases (missing MOLD
argument to NULL)
The Fortran standard requires that NULL() passed to an assumed-rank
dummy argument has a MOLD argument.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/104819
* gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90: Add MOLD argument to NULL().
* gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_8.f90: Likewise.
---
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90 | 6 +++---
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_8.f90 | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90
index 6a3cc94483e..f22d43ab955 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90
@@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ program test
is_present = .false.
- call fpa(null(), null()) ! No copy back
- call fpi(null(), null()) ! No copy back
- call fno(null(), null()) ! No copy back
+ call fpa(null(iip), null(jjp)) ! No copy back
+ call fpi(null(iip), null(jjp)) ! No copy back
+ call fno(null(iip), null(jjp)) ! No copy back
call fno() ! No copy back
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_8.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_8.f90
index 5873296a7a5..34ff42c0be2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_8.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_8.f90
@@ -22,13 +22,13 @@ program main
call f (ii)
call f (489)
call f ()
- call f (null())
+ call f (null(kk))
call f (kk)
if (j /= 2) STOP 1
j = 0
nullify (ll)
- call g (null())
+ call g (null(ll))
call g (ll)
call g (ii)
if (j /= 1) STOP 2
--
2.35.3
next reply other threads:[~2023-11-22 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-22 21:02 Harald Anlauf [this message]
2023-11-23 9:38 ` Mikael Morin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=trinity-89336fcc-9c0b-4a96-b6ed-d254a11cc5bb-1700686952233@3c-app-gmx-bs17 \
--to=anlauf@gmx.de \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).