From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fortran-return-49035-listarch-fortran=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 84967 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2017 09:12:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <fortran.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:fortran-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Post: <mailto:fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84938 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2017 09:12:14 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:743
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients
X-HELO: smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:12:13 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1])	by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0A017;	Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:12:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with LMTP id uau2nUhr0MVb; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:12:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.152])	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CCC016;	Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:12:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from ro@localhost)	by lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.15.2+Sun/8.15.2/Submit) id v8Q9BxN9022064;	Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:11:59 +0200 (MEST)
From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,        David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,        Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist.janne@gmail.com>,        Fortran List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 82143: add a -fdefault-real-16 flag
References: <CAGWvnykd97Ly0UpvX+NUF7QGh9EHt6_kg2d-N==-0_ZAkicQeQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAKwh3qjwQDNTpsDUZE_SFKkdQuC9EBk_UbkE52172+7Ea1UQ0g@mail.gmail.com>	<20170925212335.GA44284@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>	<CAKwh3qi2N4LCiMzv1obi5t53YiFn6eABecNFHWYfsWkRp=YE+Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CAKwh3qhkWVV-DzyN1JQPhse=Q9ZZSQaDReGoHi5=drgLMLBY+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:12:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAKwh3qhkWVV-DzyN1JQPhse=Q9ZZSQaDReGoHi5=drgLMLBY+Q@mail.gmail.com>	(Janus Weil's message of "Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:03:12 +0200")
Message-ID: <yddlgl1x1r4.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2

Hi Janus,

> Attached is a more complete patch, which should fix all problems that
> were reported concerning these two test cases. Would be great if
> someone could confirm that it works on a failing target (I currently
> only have access to x86_64-linux-gnu machines).

I've just checked sparc-sun-solaris2.11: works fine.  promotion_3.f90
PASSes as before, but promotion_4.f90 is now UNSUPPORTED instead of
failing.

> Ok for trunk?

The new fortran_real_10 effective-target keyword needs documenting in
sourcebuild.texi.

Thanks.
        Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University