From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-bugzilla-return-636-listarch-frysk-bugzilla=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21899 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2006 22:55:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 21799 invoked by uid 48); 11 Dec 2006 22:55:26 -0000
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:55:00 -0000
From: "pmuldoon at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20061211225526.3703.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/3703] New: public ByteBuffer get (long index, byte[] dst, int off, int len) should use peekFully
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00635.txt.bz2
List-Id: <frysk-bugzilla.sourceware.org>

Right now it uses:

peek(lowWater + index, dst, off, len);

But it should use:

peekFully(lowWater + index,dst,off,len)

In the PtraceByteBuffer implementation, the get method will only return one word
using peek.

-- 
           Summary: public ByteBuffer get (long index, byte[] dst, int off,
                    int len) should use peekFully
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2231,2243
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3703

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.