From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-bugzilla-return-683-listarch-frysk-bugzilla=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14210 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2006 19:04:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 14153 invoked by uid 48); 14 Dec 2006 19:04:10 -0000
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:04:00 -0000
From: "pmuldoon at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20061214190409.3727.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/3727] New: ByteBuffer get (long index, byte[] dst, int off, int len) very slow.
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00682.txt.bz2
List-Id: <frysk-bugzilla.sourceware.org>

Reference:

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3703

Now that the reads are done correctly, they do so by word. This makes large core
file dumping painfully slow. There are known optimizations that help speed up
large reads. Need to implement.

-- 
           Summary: ByteBuffer get (long index, byte[] dst, int off, int
                    len) very slow.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3727

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.