From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-bugzilla-return-816-listarch-frysk-bugzilla=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20685 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2006 15:32:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 20658 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2006 15:32:41 -0000
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:32:00 -0000
From: "cagney at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20061222153241.3784.cagney@redhat.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/3784] New: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00815.txt.bz2
List-Id: <frysk-bugzilla.sourceware.org>

dejagnu has the advantage of working well with serial I/O programs (due to
expect) but the disadvantage of being yet another testing framework to learn and
the test model isn't very consistent when compared to JUnit.

PyUnit has the advantage of being shared with dogtail's test framework, being
similar to JUnit in its approach, but being an unknown when it comes to handling
serial I/O (and some people dislike python more then tcl :-)

How good is PyUnit at handling seerial I/O?

-- 
           Summary: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.