public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "npremji at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/3822] New: TestFStack(StressTestFStack) ptrace: no such process during teardown.
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com> (raw)

Occassionally when running TestFStack with FINEST output I get the error (during
teardown):
Note that testStressMultiThreaded was changed to have 20 clones instead of just 7.

There was 1 error:
1) testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.StressTestFStack)ptrace: No such process
   at frysk.sys.Errno.throwErrno(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.notifyPtraceThread(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace.detach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask.sendDetach(TestRunner)
   at
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Attached$WaitForUnblock.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.performDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Detaching.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$3.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Proc$7.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.TestFStack.multiThreaded(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.StressTestFStack.testStressMultiThreadedDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner).

Log to follow.

-- 
           Summary: TestFStack(StressTestFStack) ptrace: no such process
                    during teardown.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3822

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


             reply	other threads:[~2007-01-02 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-02 16:43 npremji at redhat dot com [this message]
2007-01-02 16:45 ` [Bug general/3822] " npremji at redhat dot com
2007-01-03 21:50 ` npremji at redhat dot com
2007-01-05 11:44 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-01-05 21:34 ` npremji at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).