From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-bugzilla-return-947-listarch-frysk-bugzilla=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23103 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2007 20:00:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 22875 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2007 19:59:54 -0000
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:00:00 -0000
From: "npremji at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20070116195954.3875.npremji@redhat.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/3875] New: TestLib AckProcesses should be broken down between funit-child processes and non-funit processes
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2
List-Id: <frysk-bugzilla.sourceware.org>

Currently the funit-child process is assumed for some AckProcess derivatives but
not all. Sometimes it is unclear which processes are funit-child and which are not. 

Needs to have the funit-child processes on the bottom level as extensions to
more generic AckProcesses. Ex. FunitChildAttached extends AttachedAckProcess.

-- 
           Summary: TestLib AckProcesses should be broken down between
                    funit-child processes and non-funit processes
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3875

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.