From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3395 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2007 22:40:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 3335 invoked by uid 48); 19 Jan 2007 22:39:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070119223950.3334.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "cagney at redhat dot com" To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070112091240.3864.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> References: <20070112091240.3864.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug general/3864] Tests timeout is too short X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com 2007-01-19 22:39 ------- A 300 second timeout would mean waiting 5 minutes for each test to fail, outch! Since each frysk test (ignoring the stress tests which are not run by default) should complete in a second or so, a 5 second timeout is sufficient as a default. For the cases where something such as gdb, or the logger, is slowing things down, a [recently added] -timeout N option is available. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |2234 nThis| | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3864 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.