From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13071 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2007 23:45:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 12961 invoked by uid 48); 15 Feb 2007 23:45:43 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:45:00 -0000 From: "mcvet at redhat dot com" To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org Message-ID: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug general/4060] New: Missing stack frames on i386 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00416.txt.bz2 List-Id: Sometimes when stepping into new functions on i386, the frame being stepped / from/ may dissapear when performing instruction steps. TestStackBacktrace.testFramePushing and TestStackBacktrace.testFramePopping are designed to test this. These tests do not fail on x86_64 but do appear to fail on x86. I'll attach a testcase, but the general sitation is that the order of frames should be: main -> foo -> jump but during the push of 'jump' onto the call stack, the trace may show: main -> jump and similarly doing the pop of 'jump' off of the call stack. -- Summary: Missing stack frames on i386 Product: frysk Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com CC: cagney at redhat dot com,mcvet at redhat dot com,npremji at redhat dot com OtherBugsDependingO 1839,3076,3346 nThis: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4060 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.