From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17481 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2007 17:02:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 17434 invoked by uid 48); 21 Feb 2007 17:01:47 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070221170147.17433.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "cagney at redhat dot com" To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org> References: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug general/4087] New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00454.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com 2007-02-21 17:01 ------- the .java.o rule is an optional check that there is no duplicate class (which gcj has in the past botched). It can be wrapped in a HAVE_JV_SCAN conditional. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.