From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-bugzilla-return-1484-listarch-frysk-bugzilla=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24168 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2007 18:16:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 24098 invoked by uid 48); 15 Mar 2007 18:16:11 -0000
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:16:00 -0000
From: "cagney at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20070315181611.4196.cagney@redhat.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/4196] New: invoke: frysk <pid>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00632.txt.bz2
List-Id: <frysk-bugzilla.sourceware.org>

Invoking frysk as:
   frysk <pid>
should cause frysk??

-> start the source code browser on that process
-> start the monitor on that process; or more exactly, start the setup assistant
with that process pre-selected

I'm going to recommend the second, since the command line utilities all do an
attach/continue and it would be consistent.

Please debate :-)

-- 
           Summary: invoke: frysk <pid>
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4196

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.