From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1333 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2007 15:37:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 1260 invoked by uid 48); 19 Mar 2007 15:36:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070319153657.1259.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mark at klomp dot org" To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070319143146.4212.cagney@redhat.com> References: <20070319143146.4212.cagney@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug general/4212] funit doesn't report bad method names until during test run X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00680.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org 2007-03-19 15:36 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > For instance: > > cagney@toidi$ /usr/lib/frysk/funit > 'testHitAndRunXXX(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)' > 'testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)' > Couldn't find method with name: testHitAndRunXXX testHitAndRun shouldn't be XXX disabled. Or was this just an example? > Running testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints) ...ERROR > java.lang.NullPointerException This should now be fixed in CVS. But I assume this is also not really related to the core issue of this bug report. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4212 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.