From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <frysk-bugzilla-return-1651-listarch-frysk-bugzilla=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3777 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2007 19:26:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 3741 invoked by uid 48); 22 Mar 2007 19:26:19 -0000
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:26:00 -0000
From: "pmuldoon at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20070322192619.4265.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/4265] New: In LinuxPtraceProcState Detaching State, using Proc.getTasks() maybe problematic
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00799.txt.bz2
List-Id: <frysk-bugzilla.sourceware.org>

The state needs to know a full set of tasks to be constructed, but in a detached
state .getTasks() may not return the full set of tasks.

-- 
           Summary: In LinuxPtraceProcState Detaching State, using
                    Proc.getTasks() maybe problematic
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4265

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.