From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29565 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2007 16:26:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 28398 invoked by uid 48); 26 Mar 2007 16:26:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070326162605.28391.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "cmoller at redhat dot com" To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com> References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6: testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver) X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00828.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com 2007-03-26 17:26 ------- What's happening is that in TestTaskTerminateObserver.java, Terminate.updateTerminating(...) is never executed when funit-exit is passed a - Sig.KILL_. Before I go to all the effort of possibly re-chasing an already chased bug, I thought I'd ask about the possibility that this is related to the x-state bug; i.e., is a "terminating" condition related to the transient X state? If so, if you SIGKILL a process, is it possible to miss a "terminating" and go straight to "terminated?" (A little background for Roland, to whom I've cc-ed this: this is a bug where a process being sent a kill(SIGKILL) should trigger a "terminating" observer, but doesn't seem to be doing that.) -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roland at redhat dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.