From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2674 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2007 20:23:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 2575 invoked by uid 48); 26 Mar 2007 20:23:32 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070326202332.2574.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "cmoller at redhat dot com" To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com> References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6: testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver) X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00838.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com 2007-03-26 21:23 ------- Yeah, for SIGKILL, updateTerminating never gets hit; updateTerminated does. The pattern of waitpid returns is similar in all test cases (terminate(), terminated(), and terminating()), nothing unexpected, but the first two fail for a lack of a terminating event. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.