public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cmoller at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070327160733.31092.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>


------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com  2007-03-27 17:07 -------
Here's what's happening:

1. Wait.cxx:processStatus() decodes the waitpid status and if (WIFSTOPPED
(status) && (PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT ==  WSTOPEVENT (status))) it calls exitEvent()

2. LinuxPtraceHost.PollWaitOnSigChld.exitEvent() calls processTerminatingEvent()

3. Task.processTerminatingEvent() calls .handleTerminatingEvent()

4. LinuxPtraceTaskState.handleTerminatingEvent() calls notifyTerminating()

5. Task.notifyTerminating() calls updateTerminating()

6. TestTaskTerminateObserver. updateTerminating sets the int terminating value.

If, in Wait.cxx:processStatus(), status == 9,  (KILL), WIFSIGNALED (status) is
true rather than WIFSTOPPED (status), so none of the foregoing happens, causing
the test to fail.  What I don't know is if the process described above is in
fact what the programmer who wrote it intended and the test exercises conditions
that weren't meant to be exercised, or if the process described is flawed or
incomplete.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-27 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-04 18:08 [Bug general/3639] New: " cmoller at redhat dot com
2006-12-04 20:05 ` [Bug general/3639] " cagney at redhat dot com
2007-01-31 22:15 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-01-31 22:16 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-01-31 22:22 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-03-26 16:26 ` cmoller at redhat dot com
2007-03-26 16:55 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-03-26 18:34 ` cmoller at redhat dot com
2007-03-26 20:11 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-03-26 20:23 ` cmoller at redhat dot com
2007-03-26 20:51 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-03-26 20:52 ` roland at gnu dot org
2007-03-27  3:40 ` cmoller at redhat dot com
2007-03-27  3:49 ` roland at gnu dot org
2007-03-27 16:07 ` cmoller at redhat dot com [this message]
2007-04-05 15:22 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-07-04 19:06 ` cagney at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070327160733.31092.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).