From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25501 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2007 23:11:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 24963 invoked by uid 48); 3 Apr 2007 23:11:39 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070403231139.24962.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pmuldoon at redhat dot com" To: frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070403232655.4315.npremji@redhat.com> References: <20070403232655.4315.npremji@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug general/4315] Elf constructor causes double free. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact frysk-bugzilla-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: frysk-bugzilla-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com 2007-04-04 00:11 ------- I really do not like that constructor at all. Passing in a random pointer, of unknown state, to a native objects whos state is also unknown. There is no contract on the management of that pointer either. The ineivtables results is things like mentioned: double frees. The first question that crosses my mind is what drives the need for this constructor in the first place? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4315 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.